Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with two different post and core systems in a maxillary central incisor: A finite element analysis study


Article Sidebar

PDF 13
Published: Nov 12, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2024.6402
Keywords:
Polyether ether ether ketone (PEEK), Nickel-Chromium, Finite element analysis, Post and core
Section
Original Articles
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

D S S Vishnu Pavan
G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital
Naga Lakshmi Reddy Sampathi
G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital
Upendra Natha Reddy
G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital
Sathish Kumar Neshaneni
G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital
Shabharish Shyam Kumar Medum
G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital
Ch Meher Meenakshi
G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Abstract

Background: An endodontic post plays a crucial role in stabilizing and supporting a core restoration when insufficient coronal dentin remains after root canal treatment. It is inserted into the prepared root canal, strengthening the restoration and enabling it to endure chewing forces, thereby helping to preserve the tooth structure and overall durability of the restoration.


Aim: To evaluate the biomechanical behaviour and long-term safety of high-performance polymer PEEK as an intra-radicular dental post-core material through comparative finite element analysis (FEA) with other traditional (Nickel-Chromium) post-core material.


Materials and methods: CBCT scanning of a maxillary central incisor and its supporting structures was used to construct a two-3D solid model of endodontically treated teeth for finite element analysis (FEA). PEEK has a lower elastic modulus than root dentin and showed comparably more favourable stress distribution and high failure resistance than conventional post-core material. Two materials, Nickel-Chromium and PEEK, with the same crown design, were simulated to compare traditionally used post-core materials and evaluate their post-core properties. A 3D model of the maxillary central incisor area, including restorative components, was created. The masticatory load of 100 N was simulated at a 5 mm distance from the incisal edge and applied at a 45? angle to the long axis of the tooth.


Results: PEEK and metal post models demonstrated similar patterns and values of maximum equivalent stresses in the overall components of the model, except for the post and crown. In the apex region of the PEEK post-core case, the values of stresses were lower than those of metal posts.


Conclusion: PEEK post-core, with a lower elastic modulus than dentine, exhibited a favourable stress distribution profile at the intraradicular surface, indicating a lower possibility of root fracture than conventional post-core materials.

Article Details


How to Cite
Pavan, D. S. S. V., Sampathi, N. L. R., Reddy, U. N., Neshaneni, S. K., Medum, S. S. K., & Meenakshi, C. M. (2024). Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with two different post and core systems in a maxillary central incisor: A finite element analysis study. International Journal of Dental Materials, 6(4), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2024.6402
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

D S S Vishnu Pavan, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G  Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Naga Lakshmi Reddy Sampathi, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Professor & HOD of Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Upendra Natha Reddy, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.  

Sathish Kumar Neshaneni, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 

Shabharish Shyam Kumar Medum, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Ch Meher Meenakshi, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

References

  1. Ibrahim RO, AL ZAHAWI AR, Sabri LA. Mechanical and thermal stress evaluation of PEEK prefabricated post with different head design in endodontically treated tooth: 3D-finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 202;40(2):508-18. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-053
  2. Polesel A. Restoration of the endodontically treated posterior tooth. G Ital Endod. 2014;28: 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2014.05.007
  3. Hargrevaves KM, Berman LH. Cohen pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. p.824.
  4. Veríssimo C, Simamoto Júnior PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PC. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:234-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.006
  5. Badami V, Ketineni H, Pb S, Akarapu S, Mittapalli SP, Khan A:Comparative evaluation of different postmaterials on stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth using the finite element analysis method: asystematic review. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e29753. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29753
  6. Baba NZ, GoldenG, Goodacre CJ. Nonmetallic prefabricated dowels: a review of compositions, properties, laboratory, and clinical test results. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:527-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00464.x
  7. Al-Qarni FD. Customized post and cores fabricated with CAD/CAM technology: a literature review. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:4771-9. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S365296
  8. Lee KS, Shin JH, Kim JE, Kim JH, Lee WC, Shin SW, Lee JY. Biomechanical evaluation of a tooth restored with high performance polymer PEKK post?core system: A 3D finite element analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017(1):1373127. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1373127
  9. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E., Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(4):360–367. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.75
  10. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(8):709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.010
  11. Sakaguchi RL and Powers JM, Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.
  12. Ashraf MC, Sujesh M, Ravikumar C, Rajanikanth A, Duggineni CR, Sunitha K. An overview of applications of PEEK polymer in prosthodontics. Int J Dent Mater. 2022;4(2):42-5. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2022.4204
  13. Rocha RF, Anami LC, Campos TM, Melo RM, Souza RO, Bottino MA. Bonding of the polymer polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to Human dentin: Effect of surface treatments. Braz Dent J 2016;27:693-699. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600796
  14. Song CH, Choi JW, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lee SH, Kang ES, et al. Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of a polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) tooth post cemented with various surface treatments and various resin cements. Mater (Basel). 2018;11: 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060916
  15. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)- durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008
  16. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim III HB, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomater. 2006;27(3):324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011
  17. Lee JH. Fabricating a custom zirconia post-and-core without a post-and-core pattern or a scan post. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:186-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.004
  18. Bittner N, Hill T, Randi A. Evaluation of a one-piece milled zirconia post and core with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:369-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60080-7
  19. Huysmans MC, Van der Varst PG. Finite element analysis of quasistatic and fatigue failure of post and cores. J Dent. 1993;21(1):57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90054-T
  20. Jain Y, Kumar S. Stress analysis using photoelasticity technique–a review. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2017;5(VIII):2066-70. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2017.8293
  21. Yoon HG, Oh HK, Lee DY, Shin JH. 3-D finite element analysis of the effects of post location and loading location on stress distribution in root canals of the mandibular 1st molar. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20160406. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0406
  22. Carvalho MA, Lazari PC, Gresnigt M, Del Bel Cury AA, Magne P. Current options concerning the endodonticallytreated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e74. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0074
  23. Nanda SM, Nanda T, Yadav K, Sikka N. Fibre post & all ceramic crown —a simple approach to the perfect smile. Sch J Dent Sci. 2015;2:247-249.
  24. Al-Omiri MK, Mahmoud AA, Rayyan MR, Abu-Hammad O. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview. J Endod. 2010;36:1439-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.005
  25. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004;30: 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
  26. Komada W, Miura H, Okada D, Yoshida K. Study on the fracture strength of root reconstructed with post and core: alveolar bone resorbed case. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25(1):177–182. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.177
  27. Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(2):130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.013
  28. Sorrentino R, Aversa R, Ferro V, Auriemma T, Zarone F, Ferrari M, Apicella A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with diferent post, core and crown materials. Dent Mater. 2007;23(8):983-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.08.006
  29. Dejak B, M?otkowski A. Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(2):115-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60011-5
  30. Pa?ka K, Bienia? J, D?bski H, Niewczas A. Finite element analysis of thermo-mechanical loaded teeth. Comput Mater Sci. 2012;64:289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.037
  31. Celebi AT, Icer E, Eren MM, Baykasoglu C, Mugan A, Yildiz E. Thermal-stress analysis of ceramic laminate veneer restorations with different incisal preparations using micro-computed tomography-based 3D finite element models. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;75:302-13.