Direct composite veneers - restoring esthetics by procuring patient demand: a case report

Authors

  • Yavaneetha Reddy Vishnu Dental College
  • Sunil Dhaded AME’s Dental College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2019.1305

Keywords:

Dental composites, restoration, aesthetic, discoloration, fracture, laminates

Abstract

Re-establishing a patient’s lost dental esthetic appearance is one of the most important topics for contemporary dentistry. New treatment materials and methods have been coming on the scene, day by day, in order to achieve such an aim. Most dentists prefer more conservative and aesthetic approaches, such as direct and indirect laminate veneer restorations, instead of full-ceramic crowns for anteriors where aesthetics is really important.

Laminate veneers are restorations which are envisioned to correct existing abnormalities, esthetic deficiencies and discolorations. Laminate veneer restorations may be processed in two different ways: direct or indirect. Direct laminate veneers have no need to be prepared in the laboratory and are based on the principle of application of a composite material directly to the prepared tooth surface in the dental clinic. Indirect laminate veneers may be produced from composite materials or ceramics, which are cemented to the tooth with an adhesive resin. In this case report, direct composite laminate veneer technique used for patients with esthetic problems is described and six-month follow-up are discussed. As a conclusion, direct laminate veneer restorations may be a treatment option for patients with the esthetic problems of anterior teeth in case similar to those reported here.

Author Biography

Sunil Dhaded, AME’s Dental College

HOD and Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, AME’s Dental College, Raichur, India.

References

1. Keri D, Direct resin veneers, a conservative approach. Aesthet Dent Today 2009;33.
2. Park’s text book of preventive and social medicine, 19th edition.
3. Hickel R, Heidemann D, Staehle HJ, Minnig P, Wilson NHF. Direct composite restorations extended use in anterior and posterior situations. Clin Oral Invest. 2004;8:43–4.
4. Aristidis GA, Dimitra B. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. Quint Int. 2002;33:185–9.
5. Faunce FR, Myers DR. Laminate veneer restoration of permanent incisors. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976;93:790–2.
6. Hemmings WK, Darbar UR, Vaughan S. Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: Results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:287–93.
7. Berksun S, Kedici PS, Saglam S. Repair of fractured porcelain restorations with composite bonded porcelain laminate contours. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:457–8.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-04