Embracing Digital Technology in Implantology: From Current Practice to Future Potential
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digitalization has transformed the field of implantology, enabling clinicians to achieve higher precision, efficiency, and predictability across all phases of treatment. This review explores the key digital technologies currently applied in implant dentistry, including cone-beam computed tomography, intraoral scanners, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems, static and dynamic guided surgery, and emerging applications of artificial intelligence. These innovations have optimized diagnosis, virtual treatment planning, and surgical execution, enabled minimally invasive procedures and enhanced patient outcomes. Additionally, digital workflows have streamlined prosthetic design and fabrication, reduced chairside time and improved communication between clinicians, laboratories, and patients. However, challenges such as high initial investment, steep learning curves, software interoperability issues, and data security concerns remain barriers to universal adoption. Future research should focus on integrating artificial intelligence with robotics, advancing 3D printing for fully customized implants, and developing cost-effective, open-source solutions to make digital implantology more accessible worldwide. By critically reviewing current evidence, this paper highlights how digitalization continues to shape the future of implant dentistry and emphasizes the need for ongoing training, research, and innovation.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Joda T, Waltimo T, Probst-Hensch N, Pauli-Magnus C, Zitzmann NU. Health data in dentistry: an attempt to master the digital challenge. Public Health Genomics. 2019 Sep 19;22(1-2):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501643
2. D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):121-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12175
3. Thondati Poornachandra Rao, Manandhar S, Pinnamaneni M, Kalakota S, Bhola R, Singh S. Digital implant planning and guided surgery: current trends and clinical outcomes. Sch J Dent Sci. 2025;12(4):43-48.
4. Bernauer SA, Zitzmann NU, Joda T. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics updated: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(5):679. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050679
5. Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Naert I, Jacobs R, Teughels W, Quirynen M. Accuracy and patient-centered outcome variables in guided implant surgery: a RCT comparing immediate with delayed loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):427-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12583
6. Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsky E, Mangano C. Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163107
7. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ, Mah JK, Hatcher D, Kim MJ, Sohn DS. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012;21(2):78-86. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5
8. Ramis-Alario A, Tarazona-Alvarez B, Cervera-Ballester J, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in measuring the periapical area of teeth scheduled for periapical surgery. A cross-sectional study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(8):e732-e738. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55986
9. Deeb G, Antonos L, Tack S, Carrico C, Laskin D, Deeb JG. Is cone-beam computed tomography always necessary for dental implant placement?. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017;75(2):285-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.029
10. Vinci R, Manacorda M, Abundo R, Lucchina AG, Scarano A, Crocetta C, et al. Accuracy of edentulous computer-aided implant surgery as compared to virtual planning: a retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):774. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030774
11. Van Dessel J, Nicolielo LF, Huang Y, Slagmolen P, Politis C, Lambrichts I, Jacobs R. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(4):411-424.
12. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Barbato E. The accuracy of CBCT in measuring jaws bone density. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(10):1425-1429.
13. Albanchez-González MI, Brinkmann JC, Peláez-Rico J, López-Suárez C, Rodríguez-Alonso V, Suárez-García MJ. Accuracy of digital dental implants impression taking with intraoral scanners compared with conventional impression techniques: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042026
14. Roig E, Garza LC, Álvarez-Maldonado N, Maia P, Costa S, Roig M, et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and three conventional impression methods for two neighboring implants. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228266
15. Afrashtehfar KI, Alnakeb NA, Assery MKM. Accuracy of intraoral scanners versus traditional impressions: a rapid umbrella review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(3):101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101719
16. Ma B, Yue X, Sun Y, et al. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:636. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0
17. Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Carosi P, Laureti A, Londono J, Wang HL. Photogrammetry versus intraoral scanning in complete-arch digital implant impression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025;27(3):e70059. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70059
18. Berta GM, Luigi C, Miguel PD, Carlos BJ. Prospective clinical study on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in patients with distal free-end implants. Conventional versus CAD-CAM surgical guides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025;36(3):314-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14384
19. Kasradze D, Kubilius R. Influence of guide support on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (sCAIS) in partially edentulous cases using a keyless guiding system: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):563. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05955-x
20. Robaian A, Hamed MM, Ahmed Y, Hassanein FEA. Comparative evaluation of customized CAD/CAM vs. stock titanium abutments for immediate implant placement in class II extraction sockets: a randomized controlled trial. Dent J (Basel). 2025;13(8):371. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080371
21. Ferrari M, Tricarico MG, Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, Gherlone EF, Zarone F, Sorrentino R. 3-year randomized controlled prospective clinical trial on different CAD-CAM implant abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(6):1134-1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12418
22. Elsayed A, Farrag G, Chaar MS, Abdelnabi N, Kern M. Influence of different CAD/CAM crown materials on the fracture of custom-made titanium and zirconia implant abutments after artificial aging. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(1):91-96. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6137
23. Younis H, Lv C, Xu B, Zhou H, Du L, Liao L, Zhao N, Long W, Elayah SA, Chang X, He L. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Head Face Med. 2024;20(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00433-1
24. Pellegrino G, Ferri A, Del Fabbro M, Prati C, Gandolfi MG, Marchetti C. Dynamic Navigation in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(5):e121-e140. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8770
25. Wu XY, Huang ZL, Liu BL, Lv XL, Shi JY, Lai HC. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Robotic Surgery, Dynamic Navigation, Fully Static Guide, and Freehand Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025;0(0):1-28. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11531
26. Jindanil T, Marinho-Vieira LE, de-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Jacobs R. A unique artificial intelligence-based tool for automated CBCT segmentation of mandibular incisive canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52(8):20230321. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230321
27. Alqutaibi AY, Algabri RS, Alamri AS, Alhazmi LS, Almadani SM, Alturkistani AM, Almutairi AG. Advancements of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting dental implant prognosis from radiographic images: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(6):2177-2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.036
28. Rajan RSS, Kumar HSK, Sekhar A, Nadakkavukaran D, Feroz SMA, Gangadharappa P. Evaluating the Role of AI in Predicting the Success of Dental Implants Based on Preoperative CBCT Images: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S886-S888. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1117_23
29. Elbanna L, Rahimi H, Mohammadi M, Saeedi N, Ahmadyar R, Rezaee N, Nikferjam AZ, Safi P, Singh S. Integration of digital technologies in implant dentistry: Workflow, challenges, and opportunities. Eur J Dent Oral Health. 2026;7(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2026.7.1.13414.
30. Flügge T, Kramer J, Nelson K, Nahles S, Kernen F. Digital implantology—a review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery. Part II: Prosthetic set-up and virtual implant planning. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02057-w
31. Kafedzhieva A, Vlahova A, Chuchulska B. Digital technologies in implantology: A narrative review. Bioengineering. 2025;12(9):927. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090927.
32. Wachol K, Morawiec T, Nowak-Wachol A, Kubaszek B, Kasprzyk-Kucewicz T, Baldi D, Machorowska-Pieniążek A, Skucha-Nowak M, Cholewka A. Comparative analysis of implant prosthesis treatment planning and execution following bone repair procedures using dynamic surgical navigation in augmented areas. Coatings. 2022;12(8):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12081099.
33. Saini RS, Bavabeedu SS, Quadri SA, Gurumurthy V, Kanji MA, Kuruniyan MS, Binduhayyim RI, Avetisyan A, Heboyan A. Impact of 3D imaging techniques and virtual patients on the accuracy of planning and surgical placement of dental implants: A systematic review. Digital Health. 2024;10:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241253550
34. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:25-42. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
35. Bessadet M, Drancourt N, El Osta N. Time efficiency and cost analysis between digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(1):71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.003
36. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(2):121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
37. Revilla-León M, Att W, Özcan M, Rubenstein J. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(3):470-8.
38. Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0
39. Wang J, Wang B, Liu YY, Luo YL, Wu YY, Xiang L, Yang XM, Qu YL, Tian TR, Man Y. Recent Advances in Digital Technology in Implant Dentistry. J Dent Res. 2024;103(8):787-799. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345241253794
40. Afrashtehfar KI, Alnakeb NA, Assery MK. Accuracy of intraoral scanners versus traditional impressions: A rapid umbrella review. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice. 2022;22(3):101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101719
41. Schierz O, Hirsch C, Krey KF, Ganss C, Kämmerer PW, Schlenz MA. Digital dentistry and its impact on oral health-related quality of life. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024;24(1S):101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101946
42. Mangano F. Digital dentistry. J Dent. 2021;109:103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103693
43. Saeed A, Alkhurays M, AlMutlaqah M, AlAzbah M, Alajlan SA. Future of using robotic and artificial intelligence in implant dentistry. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43209. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43209
44. Lin PY, Chen TC, Lin CJ, Huang CC, Tsai YH, Tsai YL, Wang CY. The use of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in dental surgery education and practice: A narrative review. J Dent Sci. 2024;19(Suppl 2):S91-S101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2024.10.011
45. Wang X, Guan M, Liu L, Xu R, Yang Z, Liu Z, Li D, Tang C, Wen N, Li H. The impact of mixed reality training method on novice trainees of dental implants: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1379. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06366-8.
46. Bochet Q, Raoul G, Lauwers L, Nicot R. Augmented reality in implantology: Virtual surgical checklist and augmented implant placement. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;125(12 Suppl 2):101813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024
47. Reen GS, Mohandas M, Venkatesan S. Decentralized patient centric e-health record management system using blockchain and IPFS. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT), Allahabad, India, 2019. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT48419.2019.9066212
48. Vickram AS, Infant SS, Manikandan S, Sowndharya BB, Gulothungan G, Chopra H. 3D bio-printed scaffolds and smart implants: evaluating functional performance in animal surgery models. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(6):3618-3634. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003333
49. Mokhamed T, Talib MA, Moufti MA, Abbas S, Khan F. The potential of blockchain technology in dental healthcare: a literature review. Sensors. 2023;23(6):3277. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063277
50. Mardini DC, Sharma M, Madathil S. Blockchain for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2025;10(4):469-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844241303483.