Effect of Recasting Nickel-Chromium Alloy on Surface Roughness: An in vitro Study

Main Article Content

Bharathi Munagapati
Vara Lakshmi Kotra

Abstract

Background: Dental casting alloys play a crucial role in the restoration of partial dentition. Among these, Nickel-Chromium (Ni-Cr) alloys are widely used due to their ease of availability, low cost and favourable physical properties. Incorporating at least 50% new alloy into recast Ni-Cr alloy does not significantly alter the mechanical properties of porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. From both environmental and economic perspectives, recycling dental alloys is a highly beneficial practice.
Aim: To study the influence of recasting Nickel-chromium base metal alloy on surface roughness.
Materials and Methods: A total of 120 wax patterns (10 × 6 × 1 mm) were prepared using modelling wax and invested with phosphate bonded investment material. After setting, they were subjected to burnout to eliminate wax. A Nickel-Chromium (Ni-Cr) alloy was melted using a torch flame as per manufacturer instructions and cast using a centrifugal casting machine. Castings were bench-cooled, divested, and cleaned. Sprues were removed with high-speed cutting discs, and residual investment was eliminated by sandblasting with 250-μm aluminum oxide for five minutes at a 50 mm distance, followed by ultrasonic cleaning in distilled water. Specimens were divided into six groups (n = 20 each): Group 1 used 100% new alloy, while Groups 2–6 were sequentially cast with 50% new alloy and 50% reused alloy from the preceding group. The surface roughness (Ra) of each specimen was measured using a surface roughness tester, and values were recorded in micrometres (μm). The obtained data was subjected to one-way ANOVA.
Results: Recasting of the alloy showed an increased surface roughness from groups 1 to 6. One-way ANOVA displayed a significant difference among the groups.
Conclusion: Reusing the Ni-Cr alloy resulted in a progressive increase in surface roughness. With each cycle of reuse, a statistically significant rise in the average surface roughness (Ra) was observed.

Article Details


How to Cite
Munagapati, B., & Kotra, V. L. (2025). Effect of Recasting Nickel-Chromium Alloy on Surface Roughness: An in vitro Study. International Journal of Dental Materials, 7(2), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2025.7201

Section

Original Articles

Author Biographies

Bharathi Munagapati, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Vara Lakshmi Kotra, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital

Postgraduate Student Department of prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, G Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

How to Cite

Munagapati, B., & Kotra, V. L. (2025). Effect of Recasting Nickel-Chromium Alloy on Surface Roughness: An in vitro Study. International Journal of Dental Materials, 7(2), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2025.7201

References

1. Classification system for cast alloys. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;109(5):766. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0185

2. Agrawal A, Hashmi SW, Rao Y, Garg A. Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength of Base Metal Alloys Used for Crown and Bridge on Recasting (Recycling). J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):ZC01-4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11535.6141

3. Rama Krishna All. Dental Casting Alloys (Casting Gold and Base Metal Alloys) (in) Dental Material Science. 1stedition; Jaypee Medical publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2013.

4. Palaskar J, Nadgir DV, Shah I. Effect of recasting of nickel: chromium alloy on its castability. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(3):160-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0033-x

5. Goel D, Nayakar RP, Patil R. Evaluation and comparison of effect of different surface treatments and varying alloy percentage on the elemental composition of Ni Cr base metal alloy. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2016;16(4):1-12. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2016/26204.

6. Lotwani V, Gandhewar M, Reddy S, Revathi K. Evaluation of marginal fit of castings made with an accelerated casting technique using reusable alloys in different percentages in vitro study. J Appl Dent Med Sci. 2016;2(2):32-40.

7. Thopegowda NB, Shenoy K, Shankarnarayana RK, Kukkila J, Vaddya SB, Gingipalli K. Recycling of materials used in dentistry with reference to its economical and environmental aspects. Int J Health Rehabil Sci. 2013;2(3):140-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4848.144332

8. Presswood RG. Multiple recast of a nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(2):198-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90012-4

9. Kenneth J Anusavice. Chaiyi Shen, H Ralph Rawls. Philips’ science of dental materials; Elsevier, 2013, 418-473.

10. Donald A. Hesby, Peter Kobes, Don G. Garver, and George B. Pelleu, Multiple recast of a nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;44(3):291-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90014-1

11. Jadhav VD, Motwani BK,Shinde J, Adhapure P. Comparative evaluation of conventional and accelerated castings on marginal fit and surface roughness. Contemp Clin Dent 2017;8:405-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_51_17

12. Vineeth G, Alla RK, D SR, M C SS, A V R, Yeleti H. Casting alloys: the saga of their existence and the recipe of their blend. Int J Dent Mater. 2019;1(1):25-3. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2019.1104

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.