Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in Oral Rehabilitation of Sarcopenic Patients: A Muscle-Preserving Prosthodontic Approach

Main Article Content

Srinivas Sowmya
NagaUsha Nagesh
Nanditha Kumar Mysore

Abstract

Sarcopenia, a progressive decline in skeletal muscle mass and function, has profound implications for oral health, reducing masticatory strength, adaptation to prostheses, and nutritional intake. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance polymer with favourable biomechanical, biocompatible, and digital-workflow properties. Although PEEK is increasingly used in prosthodontics, its role in preserving or enhancing orofacial muscle function in sarcopenic patients has not been systematically explored. This manuscript reviews the advantages of PEEK over traditional materials, analyses its biomechanical relevance to sarcopenia, and proposes a clinical rationale for adopting PEEK as a therapeutic material in this context. The discussion evaluates current evidence of PEEK’s application in dentures, frameworks, and implant prostheses, noting its potential to reduce muscular load, cushion occlusal forces, and improve patient comfort. Finally, this manuscript calls for targeted clinical trials focusing on sarcopenic populations to validate PEEK’s long-term efficacy in mitigating oral frailty and promoting healthy aging.

Article Details


How to Cite
Sowmya, S., Nagesh, N., & Mysore, N. K. (2025). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in Oral Rehabilitation of Sarcopenic Patients: A Muscle-Preserving Prosthodontic Approach. International Journal of Dental Materials, 7(4), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2025.7404

Section

Review Articles

Author Biographies

Srinivas Sowmya, JSS Dental College and Hospital

Department of Prosthodontic and Crown and Bridge, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

NagaUsha Nagesh, JSS Dental College and Hospital

Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 

Nanditha Kumar Mysore, JSS Dental College and Hospital

Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 

How to Cite

Sowmya, S., Nagesh, N., & Mysore, N. K. (2025). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in Oral Rehabilitation of Sarcopenic Patients: A Muscle-Preserving Prosthodontic Approach. International Journal of Dental Materials, 7(4), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2025.7404

References

1. Larsson L, Degens H, Li M, Salviati L, Lee YI, Thompson W, Kirkland JL, Sandri M. Sarcopenia: aging-related loss of muscle mass and function. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(1):427-511. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00061.2017

2. Umeki K, Watanabe Y, Hirano H, Edahiro A, Ohara Y, Yoshida H, Obuchi S, Kawai H, Murakami M, Takagi D, Ihara K. The relationship between masseter muscle thickness and appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Japanese community-dwelling elders: A cross-sectional study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;78:18-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.014

3. Azzolino D, Passarelli PC, De Angelis P, Piccirillo GB, D’Addona A, Cesari M. Poor oral health as a determinant of malnutrition and sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2898. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122898

4. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomater. 2007;28(32):4845–4869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013

5. Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(4):5426–5445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15045426

6. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomater. 2006;27(3):324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011

7. Sagomonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, Aronow MS, Gronowicz GA. PEEK polymers promote bone cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;91(2):408–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32229

8. Schwitalla A, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(6):743–749. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002

9. Ashraf MC, Sujesh M, Ravikumar C, Rajanikanth A, Duggineni CR, Sunitha K. An overview of applications of PEEK polymer in prosthodontics. Int J Dent Mater. 2022;4(2):42-5. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2022.4204

10. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthod Res 2016;60:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001

11. Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):7-12. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-345

12. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1278–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014

13. Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The use of PEEK in fixed and removable prosthodontics: A systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2016;24(1):19–24.

14. Skirbutis G, Dzingutė A, Masiliūnaitė V, Šulcaitė G, Žilinskas J. PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija. 2017;19(1):19–23.

15. de Oliveira PHB, Ferreira GF, Gama LT, Carletti TM, Rodrigues Garcia RCM. Chewing with Co-Cr or PEEK denture frameworks: A randomized crossover clinical study. J Prosthodont. 2025;34(7):686-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14039

16. Ali KA, Bateson SR, Jury RM, Ellakwa AF, Pearson GJ, Martin N. A pilot randomized controlled crossover trial comparing early OHRQoL outcomes of cobalt-chromium versus PEEK removable partial denture frameworks. J Dent. 2020;102:103473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103473

17. Chen Y-T, Lee H-E, Lin C-L. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical function for four removable partial denture designs with three framework materials: Co-Cr, Ti-6Al-4V, and PEEK. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50363-1

18. Montero J, Guadilla Y, Flores J, Pardal-Peláez B, Quispe-López N, Gómez-Polo C, Dib A. Patient-Centered Treatment Outcomes with Full-Arch PEEK Rehabilitation Supported on Four Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants. A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 5;10(19):4589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194589

19. Montero J, Dib A, Guadilla Y, Flores J, Pardal-Peláez B, Quispe-López N, Gómez-Polo C. Functional and patient-centered treatment outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by two immediate or conventionally loaded implants: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Aug 6;10(16):3477. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163477

20. Pavan DSSV, Sampathi NLR, Reddy UN, Neshaneni SK, Medum SSK, Meenakshi CM. Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with two different post and core systems in a maxillary central incisor: A finite element analysis study. Int J Dent Mater. 2024;6(4):87-93. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2024.6402

21. Sreenivasulu D, Sowjanya JL. Exploring the Potential of PEEK in Prosthetic Dentistry: A Contemporary Perspective. Int J Dent Mater. 2024;6(2):41-4. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2024.6203

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.