Main Article Content
From the past, there has been a lot of use of the bonding agents in restorative dentistry. Choosing of bonding systems has become a challenge for the clinicians as there was a lot of advances regarding the usage of bonding agents. Each successive modification in the formulae has led to the classification of the bonding system into many “generations”. During the past few years, these bonding agents have been replaced by the same systems that are used on dentin. This change occurred because of the benefit of bonding resin to both enamel and dentin. Extensive research is still on the way to develop the best adhesive system that can produce reliable and permanent bonds to dentin.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Ravi RK, Rama Krishna Alla, Shammas M, Devarhubli A, Dental Composite – A Versatile Restorative Material: An Overview, Ind J Dent Sci., 2013; 5(5):111-115.
2. Alla RK, Composite Resins (Tooth colored restorative materials) in; Dental Materials Science, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., New Delhi, India, 2013; 132-148.
3. Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995; 6: 302–18.
4. Fleisch AF, Sheffield PE, Chinn C, Edelstein BL, Landrigan PJ. Bisphenol A and Related Compounds in Dental Materials. Pediatrics 2010; 126:760–8.
5. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Ralph Rawls H. Bonding and bonding agents; in Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials: 12th edition, Elsevier Saunders, USA. 258 - 284.
6. Erickson RL. Surface interaction of dentin adhesive system. Oper Dent. 1992; 5 (suppl): 81-94.
7. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia A, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Annali di Stomatologia 2017;VIII (1):1-17 1
8. Buonocore M, Marsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol. 1968;13(1):61-70.
9. Swift E Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann H. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:95-110.
10. Eick J, Wilko R, Anderson C, Sorensen S. Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res. 1970;49:1359-1368.
11. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16(3):265-273.
12. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Dental adhesives in contemporary restorative dentistry. DCNA. 1998;42(4):567-577.
13. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131 Suppl:20S-25S.
14. Kanca J, Improving Bond Strength Through Acid Etching of Dentin and Bonding to Wet Dentin Surfaces, J Am Dent Assoc. 1992; 123(9):35-43.
15. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Structural evidence of a sealed tissue interface with a total-etch wet-bonding technique in vivo. J Dent Res.1994; 73(3):629-36.
16. Ruyter IE. The chemistry of adhesive agents. Oper Dent. 1992; 5 (suppl): 32-43.
17. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, et al. Resin permeation acid conditioned, moist and dry dentin: A paradigm using water free adhesive primers. J Dent Res. 1996;75: 1033-1044.
18. Poptani B, Gohil KS, Jaishree Ganjiwale, Manisha Shukla. Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth- with five seventh-generation bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3: S167-71.
19. Kallenos TN, Al-Badawi E, White GE. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class I preparations using 5th, 6th, and 7th generation composite bonding agents. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;29:323–8.
20. Al-Ehaideb AA, Mohammed H. Microleakage of one bottle dentin adhesives. Oper Dent. 2001;26:172–5.
21. Hegde & Manjunath. Bond Strength of Newer Dentin Bonding Agents to Altered Dentin Surfaces. Operative Dentistry. 2011;36(2):169-176
22. Pashley DH, Tay FR. The aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Master. 2001;17(5):430–444.
23. Ba?aran G, Ozer T, Devecio?lu Kama J. Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(3):271–275.
24. Kasraei SH, Atai M, Khamverdi Z, KhaleghNejad S. Effect of nanofiller addition to an experimental dentin adhesive on microtensile bond strength to human dentin. J Dent (Tehran) 2009;6(2):91–96.
25. Joseph P, Yadav C, Satheesh K, Rahna R. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth, seventh and eighth generation bonding agents: An in vitro study. Int Res J Pharm. 2013;4(9):143–147.
26. Nogourani MK, NejadSh J, Homayunzadeh M. Sealant Microleakage in Saliva-Contaminated Enamel: Comparison between three adhesive systems. J Dent Sch. 2010; 27(4): 197-204.
27. Townsend RD, Dunn WJ. The effect of saliva contamination on enamel and dentin using a self-etching adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(7):895-901.
28. Ibarra, Gabriela Vargas, Marcos A., Armstrong, Steve R., Cobb, Deborah S. Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-etching Adhesives to Ground and Unground Enamel. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2002; 4(2): 115-124.
29. Deepa VL, Damaraju B, Priyadharsini BI, Subbarao VV, Raju KR. Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of 5th, 6th and 7th) generation bonding agents to coronal dentin versus dentin at floor of pulp chamber: An in vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(5):72–6.
30. Nikhil V, Singh V, Chaudhry S. Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex-vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011; 2(2): 94–7.
31. Yaseen SM, Subba Reddy VV. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generation) on dentin of primary and permanent teeth: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedodon Prev Dent. 2009;27(1):33–8.
32. Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, Chakravarthy Y, Krishna V, Shivaprasad Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth and seventh generation bonding agents: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent.2014;17(1):27–30.
33. Shekar R, Ponnappa KC, Mirdha N, Narula S. To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of fifth (total etch) generation, sixth (two step, self-etch adhesive) generation and seventh (one step, self-etch adhesive) generation dentin bonding agents. Natl Res Denticon. 2013;2(2):136–43.