Debonding Resistance of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Saliva-Contaminated Dentin: An in vitro Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in dentistry as they can effectively bond to the tooth structure and release fluoride ions. However, saliva contamination during the setting process can impair bond strength and reduce the longevity of the restoration.
Aim: To evaluate the debonding resistance of different glass ionomer cements with saliva-contaminated dentin.
Materials and methods: Forty-five extracted human premolar teeth were embedded in an acrylic block. The teeth were sectioned until the dentin surface was exposed and contaminated with saliva. Then, the Poly-tetra-fluoro-ethylene tube was placed on the dentin surfaces of the specimens, and the different glass ionomer cement mixes, type IX GIC, resin-modified GIC (RMGIC), and hybrid GIC, were condensed into it. The specimens were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling for 20s at 5º to 55º temperature and were stored in distilled water for 10 days. Debonding resistance of the specimens was measured using a universal testing machine (UTM). The specimen was mounted on the UTM, and the load was applied at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute until debond occurs. The obtained data was subjected to one-way ANOVA analysis followed by post-hoc analysis.
Results: Light-cure RMGIC showed the highest debonding load (45.358 ± 15.171 N), followed by Type-IX GIC (8.048 ± 3.717 N) and Hybrid GIC (7.574 ± 3.501 N). One-way ANOVA showed significant differences among groups (p=0.000). The pair-wise comparison revealed light-cure RMGIC differed significantly from Type-IX and Hybrid GIC (p=0.000), while Type-IX and Hybrid GIC showed no significant difference (p=0.989).
Conclusion: Light-cure RMGIC exhibited superior debonding resistance compared to Type-IX and Hybrid GICs.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, Sibal GK. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(3):192-196. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005
2. Rabi T. Glass Ionomer cements: A narrative review. Eur Chem Bull. 2023;12(8):190-197.
3. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7(3):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb7030016
4. Saridena USNG, Sanka GSSJ, Alla RK, Ramaraju AV, Sajjan MC S, Mantena SR. An overview of advances in glass ionomer cements. Int J Dent Mater. 2022;4(4):89-94. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2022.4403
5. Zafar MS, Ahmed N. Therapeutic roles of fluoride released from restorative dental materials. Fluoride. 2015;48(3):184-94.
6. Jaganath BM, Krishnegowda SC, Rudranaik S, Ajakkala PS. Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Different Concentrations of Chitosan: An in vitro Study. Int J Dent Mater. 2024;6(2):37-40. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2024.6202
7. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Khan AS, Zohaib S, Martí JM, et al. Modifications in Glass Ionomer Cements: Nano-Sized Fillers and Bioactive Nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(7):1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17071134
8. Shimazu K, Karibe H, Oguchi R, Ogata K. Influence of artificial saliva contamination on adhesion in class V restorations. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(3):429– 34. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-032
9. Shimazu K, Karibe H, Ogata K. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on adhesion of dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(4):545–50. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-007
10. Meral E, Baseren NM. Shear bond strength and microleakage of novel glass- ionomer cements: An In vitro Study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22:566-572. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_543_18
11. Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:325 331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00074.x
12. Murthy SS, Murthy GS. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three commercially available glass ionomer cements in primary teeth. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:103-107.
13. Chen CN, Huang GF, Guo MK, Lin CP. An in vitro study on restoring bond strength of a GIC to saliva contaminated enamel under unrinse condition. J Dent. 2002 Jul- Aug;30(5-6):189-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00019-2
14. Bhattacharya P, Naidu J, Tambakad PB. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength and Flexural Strength of New Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement with Commonly used Glass Ionomer Cements Used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: An In Vitro Study. J Oper Dent Endo. 2018;3(2):83-91. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0062
15. Meharwade P, Parameshwarappa P, Kenchappa M, Nagaveni NB, Kashetty B. Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Methacrylate-based Composite, Resin- modified Glass Ionomer Cement, and Fuji IX Glass Ionomer Cement with Biodentine as a Base. CODS J Dent 2019;11(2):40–43. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10063-0050
16. Prabhakar AR, Raj S, Raju OS. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth. An in vitro study. J Indian Soc PedoPrev Dent. 2003;21(3):86-94.
17. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Romeo A, de la Higuera B, Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements. Angle Orthod 2003;73(1):56-63.
18. Gadekar SV, Panse AM, Jathar P, Khairnar PS, Gadekar AV, Pawar A. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Type IX GIC to Demineralized Dentin in Primary Teeth with and without Application of SDF: An In Vitro Study. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent. 2022;5(3):157–163. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3248
19. Francois P, Greenwall-Cohen J, Le Goff S, Ruscasier N, Attal J, Dursun E. Shear bond strength and interfacial analysis of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement bonded to dentin with protocols including silver diammine fluoride. J Oral Sci. 2020;62(4):444-448. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.20-0065.