Effect of 10-MDP-containing versus non-MDP Adhesives on delayed shear bond strength to enamel and dentine
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Effective bonding between restorative materials and dental substrates is critical for the longevity of composite restorations. Adhesives containing 10-MDP have demonstrated superior chemical bonding and durability compared to traditional self-etch systems.
Aim: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of an MDP-containing adhesive (Renew MDP) with two seventh-generation self-etch adhesives—Prime Restorite Bond 7 and Beauti Bond (Shofu).
Materials and methods: Thirty extracted human molars were sectioned to expose flat enamel and dentin surfaces. Samples were randomly divided into three groups with 10 (n=10) for each adhesive. Composite resin cylinders were bonded to the prepared surfaces following the manufacturer’s instructions. Shear Bond Strength was performed after 90 days using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (p < 0.05).
Results: Renew MDP showed significantly higher shear bond strength values to both enamel and dentin after 90 days compared to Prime Restorite Bond 7 and Beauti Bond (p < 0.05). Among the self-etch adhesives, Beauti Bond performed better than Prime Restorite Bond 7 but was still inferior to Renew MDP.
Conclusion: The MDP-containing adhesive (Renew MDP) exhibited superior shear bond strength, suggesting improved clinical performance compared to conventional seventh-generation adhesives.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-235.
2. Burke FJ, Hussain A, Nolan L, Fleming GJ. Methods used in dentine bonding tests: an analysis of 102 investigations on bond strength. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008;16(4):158-65.
3. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding—Variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e24–e37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149
4. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomater. 2007;28(26):3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
5. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent. 2006 Jan;34(1):77-85. https://10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.001
6. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Dental adhesives of the future. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(2):91–103.
7. Tjäderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, et al. Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine cathepsins. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004
8. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):454–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604
9. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Fall;3(3):237-45.
10. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentin. J Dent. 2012;40(6):475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012
11. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023
12. Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013;41(5):404–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001
13. Tjäderhane L, Carrilho MR, Breschi L, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Dentin basic structure and composition—an overview. Endod Topics. 2009;20(1):3-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2012.00269.x
14. Makishi P, André CB, Ayres A, Martins AL, Giannini M. Effect of Storage Time on Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Expression of Universal Adhesives Bonded to Dentin and Etched Enamel. Oper Dent. 2016;41(3):305-17. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-163-L
15. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, Van Landuyt KL, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Minagi S, Van Meerbeek B. Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(8):3187-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.026
16. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7-34.
17. Furuse AY, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Effect of evaporation of solvents from one-step, self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(1):35-9.
18. Al-Ashou WMO, Taher R, Ali AH. Shear-bond strength of different Self-Etching adhesive systems to dentin with or without laser irradiation before photopolymerization (A comparative Study). Saudi Dent J. 2022;34(8):779-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.11.009
19. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):118-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
20. Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Moszner N. Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):107-16.
21. Moszner N, Salz U. Recent developments of new components for dental adhesives and composites. Macromol Mater Eng. 2007;292(3):245-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200600414
22. Moura SK, Pelizzaro A, Dal Bianco K, de Goes MF, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Grande RH. Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel? J Adhes Dent. 2006 Apr;8(2):75-83.