Route maps for implant positioning: a review surgical templates for implant placement


Article Sidebar

Pdf 208
Published: May 15, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2021.3205
Keywords:
Implant placement, Surgical guide, Surgical template, Cone beam computed tomography, Stereolithography
Section
Review Articles
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Manaswini Draksharapu
Post graduate
Chalapathi Rao Duggineni
professor
C Ravi Kumar
Professor and HOD
G Harilal
Reader

Abstract

Dental implants are becoming a more common treatment choice in recent years, with an increasing number of patients preferring this option. Proper implant positioning is the most significant requirement for a successful implant treatment prognosis. A transfer system is necessary to ensure logical continuity between the diagnosis, prosthetic preparation, and surgical phases. Various techniques have been proposed for the fabrication of surgical guide templates in implant dentistry. This paper aims to review the associated literature and recent advancements in this field based on the design concept.

Article Details


How to Cite
Draksharapu, M., Duggineni, C. R., Ravi Kumar, C., & Harilal, G. (2021). Route maps for implant positioning: a review: surgical templates for implant placement. International Journal of Dental Materials, 3(2), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2021.3205
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Hinckfuss S, Conrad HJ, Lin L, Lunos S, Seong WJ. Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon's experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(4):311-23. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00046
  2. Pawar A, Mittal S, Singh RP, Bakshi R, Sehgal V. A step toward precision: a review on surgical guide templates for dental implants. Int J Sci Study. 2016;3(11):262-6.
  3. Hinckfuss S, Conrad HJ, Lin L, Lunos S, Seong WJ. Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon's experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(4):311-23. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00046
  4. The glossary of prosthodontic terms, J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(1):10-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013
  5. Ku YC, Shen YF. Fabrication of a radiographic and surgical stent for implants with a vacuum former. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(2):252-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80019-0
  6. Weinberg LA. CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(4):381-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90185-Q
  7. Becker CM, Kaiser DA, University of Colorado Health Science Center D. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(2):248-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80018-9
  8. Akça K, ?plikçio?lu H, Çehreli MC. A surgical guide for accurate mesiodistal paralleling of implants in the posterior edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(2):233-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.120900
  9. Neidlinger J, Lilien BA, KalantSr DC. Surgical implant stent: a design modification and simplified fabrication technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(1):70-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90243-H
  10. Unsal GS, Turkyilmaz I, Lakhia S. Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: a literature review. J Clinical Exp Dent. 2020;12(4):e409. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55871
  11. Stumpel III LJ. Cast-based guided implant placement: a novel technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(1):61-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60140-7
  12. D'Souza KM, Aras MA. Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review. J Oral Implantol. 2012 Oct 20;38(5):643-52. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00018
  13. Blustein R, Jackson R, Rotskoff K, Coy RE, Godar D. Use of splint material in the placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:47–49.
  14. Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59(4):467-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90044-3
  15. Almog DM, Torrado E, Meitner SW. Fabrication of imaging and surgical guides for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85: 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115388
  16. Mason WE, Rugani FC. Prosthetically determined implant placement for the partially edentulous ridge: a reality today. J Mich Dent Assoc. 1999;81(9):28-30.
  17. Ku YC, Shen YF. Fabrication of a radiographic and surgical stent for implants with a vacuum former. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(2):252-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80019-0
  18. Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2006;15(1):51-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00069.x
  19. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer?guided template?based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:73-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01788.x
  20. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics-E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2004 Sep 20.
  21. Basten CH, Kois JC. The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(4):451-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90554-5
  22. Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P, Sory C. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(1): 53-61.
  23. Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26(3):215-21.
  24. Maloney K, Bastidas J, Freeman K, Olson TR, Kraut RA. Cone beam computed tomography and SimPlant materialize dental software versus direct measurement of the width and height of the posterior mandible: an anatomic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(7):1923-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.003
  25. Nikzad S, Azari A. A novel stereolithographic surgical guide template for planning treatment involving a mandibular dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(7):1446-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.03.004