Self-sealing resin fixators in dentistry


Main Article Content

Rama Krishna Alla
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0668-4605

Vineeth Guduri
Savitha P Rao
Suresh Sajjan MC
Ramaraju AV

Abstract

Fixed indirect restorations bond to the prepared tooth surfaces with the use of a variety of luting agents depending upon the purpose of that rehabilitation. Success and failures of these restorations have been attributed to the quality of their bond with the tooth substrate. However, the advent of resin-based and self-adhesive resin luting agents have greatly changed this equation by altering the conventional bonding mechanisms and the durability of bond. The limited literature details of these self-adhesive resin luting agents require further exploration for the benefit of dental professionals. This review provides an overview of the composition, chemical interactions, favourable and unfavourable properties to be known for improving the scope of their utilization in dentistry.

Article Details


How to Cite
Alla, R. K., Guduri, V., Rao, S. P., MC, S. S., & AV, R. (2020). Self-sealing resin fixators in dentistry. International Journal of Dental Materials, 2(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2020.2205 (Original work published August 2, 2021)
Author Biographies

Rama Krishna Alla

Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, India

Vineeth Guduri, Vishnu Dental College

Reader, Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India – 534202.

Savitha P Rao, VS Dental College & Hospital

Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials, VS Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Suresh Sajjan MC, Vishnu Dental College

Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India – 534202.

Ramaraju AV, Vishnu Dental College

Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India – 534202.

References

  1. Sita Ramaraju DV, Rama Krishna Alla, Venkata Ramaraju Alluri, Raju MAKV. A Review of Conventional and Contemporary Luting Agents Used in Dentistry. Am J Mater Sci Eng. 2014; 2(3): 28-35. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajmse-2-3-1
  2. Mesu FP, Degradation of luting cements measured in vitro, J. Dent. Res. 1982; 61(5): 665-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610050901
  3. Anusavice KJ, Phillip's Science of Dental Materials, WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 2003, 11th Edition, 443-493.
  4. Rama Krishna Alla, Dental Materials Science, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt Limited, New Delhi, India, 2013, 1st Edition, 91-125.
  5. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM, Craig's Restorative Dental Materials, Elsevier, Mosby, Philadelphia, 2011, 12th Edition, 327-348.
  6. J'Obrien W, Dental Materials and their selection, 3rd edition, quintessence Publishing Co. Inc, 2002: 132-155.
  7. Ladha K, Verma M, Conventional and Contemporary Luting Cements: An Overview, J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010; 10(2): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0
  8. de la Macorra JC, Pradíes G, Conventional and adhesive luting cements, Clin Oral Invest. 2002;6:198-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0184-1
  9. Jivraj SA, Kim TH, Donovan TE. Selection of luting agents, part 1. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(2):149-160.
  10. Kim TH, Jivraj SA, Donovan TE. Selection of luting Agents, part 2. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(2):161-166.
  11. Zhen Chun Li, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements, J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(5): 579-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70216-7
  12. Mitchell CA, Douglas WH. Comparison of the porosity of hand mixed and capsulated glass-ionomer luting cements, Biomater. 1997;18: 1127-1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00038-0
  13. Oilo G. Luting cements: A review and comparison. Int. Dent. J. 1991; 41: 81-8.
  14. Pameijer. A Review of luting agents. Int J Dent. 2012: 1-7. Article ID 752861. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/752861
  15. Gosavi SS, Gosavi SY, Alla RK. Local and Systemic Effects of Unpolymerised Monomers, Dent Res J. 2010; 7(2): 82-87.
  16. Rosensteil SF, et al., Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature, J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3
  17. Ravi RK, Alla RK, Shammas M, Devarhubli A. Dental Composties - A Versatile Restorative material: An Overview. Ind J Dent Sci. 2013; 5(5): 111-115.
  18. Radovica I, Monticellib F, Goraccic C, Vulicevicd ZR, Ferrarie M. Self-adhesive Resin Cements: A Literature Review. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10(4): 251-258.
  19. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR, Philips' Science of Dental Materials. ELSEVIER Saunders, USA 12th edition; 329-330.
  20. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. ELSEVIER Mosby, USA, 13th edition; 344.
  21. Manso AP, Carvalho RM. Dental Cements for Luting and Bonding Restorations Self-Adhesive Resin Cements. Dent Clin N Am. 2017; 61: 821-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.006
  22. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Hadis MA, et al. Progress in dimethacrylate-based dental composite technology and curing efficiency. Dent Mater 2013;29(2):139-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.005
  23. Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Influence of ceramic thickness on mechanical properties and polymer structure of dual-cured resin luting agents. Dent Mater 2008;24(5):594-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.014
  24. Jang Y, Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS, et al. Effect of insufficient light exposure on polymerization kinetics of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 2016;42:E1-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-278-L
  25. de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Randall RC. Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater 2006;22:954-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.007
  26. Baena E, Fuentes MV, Garrido MA, et al. Influence of post-cure time on the microhardness of self-adhesive resin cements inside the root canal. Oper Dent 2012; 37(5):548-56. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-079-L
  27. Pegoraro TA, Fulgencio R, Butignon LE, et al. Effects of temperature and aging on working/setting time of dual-cured resin cements. Oper Dent 2015;40(6):E222-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-361-L
  28. Marghalani HY. Sorption and solubility characteristics of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2012;28(10):e187-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.037
  29. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, et al. Water sorption and solubility of four selfetching, self-adhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010;12(1):39-43.
  30. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005;26(33):6449-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.052
  31. Beatty MW, Swartz ML, Moore BK, et al. Effect of crosslinking agent content, monomer functionality, and repeat unit chemistry on properties of unfilled resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27(3):403-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820270314
  32. Tanaka J, Hashimoto T, Stansbury JW, et al. Polymer properties on resins composed of UDMA and methacrylates with the carboxyl group. Dent Mater J 2001;20(3):206-15. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.20.206
  33. Kerby RE, Knobloch LA, Schricker S, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of modified urethane dimethacrylate resins with reduced water sorption and solubility. Dent Mater 2009;25(3):302-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.009
  34. Madruga FC, Ogliari FA, Ramos TS, et al. Calcium hydroxide, pH-neutralization and formulation of model self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2013;29(4):413-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.004
  35. Roedel L, Bednarzig V, Belli R, et al. Self-adhesive resin cements: pH-neutralization, hydrophilicity, and hygroscopic expansion stress. Clin Oral Investig 2016;21: 1735-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1947-4
  36. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:357-363.
  37. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC. Mechanical properties of luting cements after water storage. Oper Dent 2003;28:535-542.
  38. Komine F, Tomic M, Gerds T, Strub JR. Influence of different adhesive resincements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:359-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.018
  39. Baldissara P, Valandro LF, Monaco C, Ferrari M, Bottino MA, Scotti R. Fatigueresistance of the bond of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic to human dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:97-104.
  40. Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Abbas G, Richter B. Effectiveness of a self-adhesive resin luting system on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentinbonded crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2006;14:185-188.
  41. Uy JN, Lian JN, Nicholls JI, Tan KB. Load-fatigue performance of gold crowns luted with resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.016
  42. Santos MJ, Bapoo H, Rizkalla AS, et al. Effect of dentin-cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin. Oper Dent 2011;36(5):512-20. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-392-L
  43. Benetti P, Fernandes VV, Torres CR, et al. Bonding efficacy of new self-etching, self-adhesive dual-curing resin cements to dental enamel. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13(3):231-4.
  44. Stona P, Borges GA, Montes MA, et al. Effect of polyacrylic acid on the interface and bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(3):221-7.
  45. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, et al. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20(10):963-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
  46. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Zuchner H, et al. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites: a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006;22(10):934-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.004
  47. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23(1):71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002
  48. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, et al. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20(10):963-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
  49. Stona P, Borges GA, Montes MA, et al. Effect of polyacrylic acid on the interface and bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(3):221-7.
  50. Pavan S, dos Santos PH, Berger S, et al. The effect of dentin pretreatment on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104(4):258-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60134-5
  51. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:161-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5
  52. Babu PJ, Alla RK, Ramaraju AV, Datla SR, Konakanchi A. Dental Ceramics: Part I - An overview of composition, structure and Properties. Am J Mate Eng Tech, 2015; 3(1): 13-18.
  53. Datla SR, Alla RK, Ramaraju AV, Babu PJ, Konakanchi A. Dental Ceramics: Part II - Recent Advantages in Dental Ceramics, Am J Mate Eng Tech, 2015; 3(2): 19-26.
  54. Pagniano RP, Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, et al. The effect of a layer of resin luting agent on the biaxial flexure strength of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93(5):459-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.012
  55. Blatz M, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  56. Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt G, Valandro F. Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.023
  57. Chaiyabutor Y, Mc Gowan S, Phillips K, Giordano R. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:194-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60178-X
  58. Addison O, Marquis P, Fleming G. Resin strengthening of dental ceramics- the impact of surface texture and silane. J Dent 2007;35:416-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.012
  59. Blatz M, Sadan A, Arch G, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of longterm bonding of Procera Allceram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.89
  60. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond strength and durability of porcelain bonding systems. J prosthet Dent 1996;75:163-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90094-3
  61. Konakanchi A, Alla RK, Guduri V. Silane Coupling Agents - Benevolent Binders in Composites. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2017; 31(3): 102-107.
  62. Pattanaik S, Wadkar AP. Effect of etchant variability on shear bond strength of all ceramic restorations: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2011;11(1): 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0064-y
  63. Matinlinna J, Vallittu P. Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2007;8(2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-2-1
  64. Bottino M, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.011
  65. Foudda Homsy, Elie Daou, Maha Ghotmi, Mireille Rahi, Self-adhesive cements and all ceramic crowns: a review. Int Aarab J Dent. 2014;5(2): 65-73. https://doi.org/10.12816/0028751
  66. Meng X, Yoshida K, Taira Y, et al. Effect of siloxane quantity and pH of silane coupling agents and contact angle of resin bonding agent on bond durability of resin cements to machinable ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2011;13(1):71-8.
  67. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. The shear bond strength between luting cements and zirconia ceramics after two pretreatments. Oper Dent 2005;30:382-388.
  68. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009;88(9):817-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509340881
  69. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, et al. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2014;93(4):329-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514524228
  70. Ozcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015;17(1):7-26.
  71. Yi YA, Ahn JS, Park YJ, et al. The effect of sandblasting and different primers on shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic and a self-adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent 2015;40(1):63-71. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-149-L
  72. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:265-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027
  73. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:302-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.012
  74. Wolfart M, Wolfart S, Kern M. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2006;21:519-525.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2